Conservation Ecology Group @ Durham University
  • Home
  • People
  • Research
  • Publications
  • Opportunities
  • News
  • Seminars
  • Contact
  • Biological Invasions on South Georgia

New project explores the dawn chorus across the UK

18/3/2015

0 Comments

 
A new NERC IAPETUS funded project will officially commence this October exploring the UK’s dawn chorus, it’s drivers, and it’s impact on both the birds that take part in it and on the people that experience it.  The project includes British Trust for Ornithology as a CASE partner, and we will also be working with Professor Mark Whittingham, a biologist at Newcastle University. We are excited to be welcoming Stuart Brooker back to the CEG as a PhD student to work on the project in October. Stuart is shortly to submit his research MSc with CEG exploring ecosystem services and biodiversity in urban environments.

We will be using newly available acoustic recorders and automated song recognition software to monitor and characterise the dawn chorus as its spreads across the UK. We deployed 20 recorders across UK woodland in 2014 and have just redeployed them again to monitor the onset of this year’s dawn chorus, which is now becoming apparent as dawn gets earlier.

We’ll post updates on the project, which is working in collaboration with RSPB reserves across the country, during the course of the project.


Picture
0 Comments

Chasing bees- Part iI

26/8/2014

0 Comments

 
Today I’m going to briefly chat about things to consider when buying camcorders for your research. I hope this provides a good start point for anyone wanting to film animals for research. As said in my previous entry, I am assuming that you are not going to use be able to afford very expensive cameras and you are looking to use the sort of equipment found at normal electronic stores.
The main thing to consider when choosing a camcorder is what you are hoping to film, and therefore what you’d want and need your camera to do. Say you want to film elephants from a few metres away- you probably don’t need a fantastic camera, although I’m sure it would help. If you wanted to film those elephants from miles away you may need something a bit better to let you pick out objects at a distance. In my case I needed to identify pollinators and which flowers they visit on lots of fireweed plants in the wild from one or two metres away. This meant I’d need affordable cameras (so I can have a few filming at any one time) with a good enough quality image to identify the species of fast moving bees and clearly show when they are visiting each flower. For this I got a bunch of cameras, but most were a Canon Legira HFR306 or HFR36.

The confusing thing about modern camcorders is that it can be difficult to work out what specifications are needed. Nobody wants to pay for something they don’t need, especially if you are on a limited research budget. Many manufactures make models that differ in only a few characteristics and it’s hard to tell which is good enough. Obviously if the difference between one camcorder model is one has wi-fi and night vision and the other doesn’t it’s easy to say if you need those things. However, as most camera specs are garbled nonsense to a lot of people, I'll do my best to explain what the main specifications mean and what effect they have.

Video quality

The first thing to consider is what video quality the camera can film in. Most cameras say something on the box that looks like ‘[seemingly random number]x[another seemingly random number] HD’ and lots of words like ‘FULL HD’ and ‘REAL HD’- these refer to the video quality the camera can do. Basically ignore FULL and REAL and look at the numbers, which refer to the width and height of the picture in pixels. Many camcorders can go as high as 1920x1080 (Full HD), which is generally pretty good (at time of writing) but you can get higher. Often these numbers are followed by letter either ‘p’ or ‘i’, which refer to how often the camera updates the video image (sometimes called scanning). ‘I’, or ‘interlaced scanning’, means the image is updated in alternating screens. ‘P’, or ‘progressive scanning’, means the image is updated every screen; this is generally better if you are filming fast moving objects and picking finer detail, whereas ‘i’ is fine for slower moving objects but might cause blurriness if used to film something very fast moving (like bee flight). It’s worth noting that most cameras can film in formats that are lower quality then the ones advertised on the box.
Zoom

Most cameras list the number of times it can zoom ‘optically’, with the lens, or ‘digitally’, by zooming into the recorded image. Normally once you enter digital zoom you get a loss in picture quality, though this usually isn’t that bad. If you can’t find how much optical zoom a camera can do, it’s written on the camera at the rim of the lens. 'Optical’ and ‘digital’ stabilisation of video images refers to how the camera compensates for shaking and keeps the image still; this is more important if filming in a windy place or by hand rather than from a tripod. Again ‘optical’ is mechanical stabilisation of the image and ‘digital’ is done by cropping the image a little and compensating for your movement; optical stabilisation is again better.
Picture
A lot of terms listed on the box, most of which mean basically the same thing.
Picture
If you need to know how many times optical zoom you have, look at the camcorder's lens.
Battery

Most cameras come with a small battery relative to those available. If you are going to be filming all day you’ll need a few batteries, so it’s worth checking the cost of spare batteries before you buy a camera. All manufactures make bigger versions of the default battery but there are also second party ones. Often good second party batteries are cheaper and work as well as the manufacturer's, but they sometimes lack Dolby chips, which allow the camera to know how much battery it has. Lacking a Dolby chip can be a pain for two reasons: 1) when you turn on the camera or start recording the camera may claim it can’t talk to the battery and ask if you want to continue (this may stop recording) and 2) you don’t know when the battery is going to die. Issue 1 isn’t a problem if you're not concerned about getting the camera working at the drop of a hat. I set up the cameras on tripods and had them record for hour intervals so it wasn’t an issue that they needed confirmations before they began filming. However, if you are sitting and waiting for an animal to do some momentary action that you need on film this delay could be a problem. Issue 2 is a bit more annoying but if you test how long the camera lasts when filming on the battery and keep track of how long it’s been filming (allowing some room for error) you'll probably be ok.
Words like ‘better’ and ‘worse’ are, of course, relative terms and the less good option may still be good enough depending on what you are doing. For example progressive scanning is better for filming fast moving objects but, depending on what you want to see, interlaced scanning may still be good enough. Similarly you may find that while filming in a high quality format gets a better image you may find lower quality footage is still good enough to make out what you need to see to do your research. On that note I advise where possible doing test runs to check what formats and specs are ok. This could be done on a model similar to those you want to buy (perhaps borrow from a friend or colleague).

I hope that the above has helped you work out what you may need and understand what these different specs mean. As I already said, what you need depends on what you are doing. You’ll have to decide what is good enough. However, I will say that I was able to quite adequately film and identify bees from tripods set up a meter away from fireweed plants filming in a 1920x1080p format, as long as there wasn't a lot of disturbance from the wind. Unless you’re filming something very small from very far away such a format should probably do quite well.

Picture
By Michael Harrap

Michael is an MRes student who studies pollinator foraging behaviours within vertically arranged inflorescences.

0 Comments

Finding the right fieldwork for you, finding the right assistant for fieldwork

21/8/2014

0 Comments

 
For me, starting a career in ecology was about getting out of the artificially lit office and into the wilderness, trading pens for machetes and box-ticking for fire-lighting.  Whilst I’m sure that staring at the electrical glow of a computer on a 9-5 basis has its thrills, I have always struggled to incorporate more of a balance.
Picture
And I do stress the verb struggle, as fieldwork is becoming an increasingly marginalized component of ecology/zoology/biology degrees.  Therefore chances for finding valuable fieldwork experiences are limited, which on another note, isn’t conducive towards solving the catch 22 of ‘to get fieldwork experience you need fieldwork experience’.  This article is to simply suggest how to break this circular paradoxical application process, but also to highlight the importance of knowing how you might take to fieldwork.  

Picture
Picture


OK so I’m going to be presumptuous in poising this article towards students going through higher education.  Firstly, ecology/biology/zoology etc. undergraduate programs generally offer at least one fieldwork module.  These will introduce the student to the basics of recording in the field, but it is not necessarily a realistic representation. Usually the lecturers  or demonstrators involved will have set out a definite work schedule that the entire class follows.  What’s most beneficial from these courses is discovering whether you have an affinity for fieldwork or not. Undergraduate dissertations are increasingly lab or desk based and so might not be the best opportunity for gaining experience in fieldwork per say. However, they are not to be dismissed in terms of data analysis, question posing or methodological design, all important skills worth sharing on your CV.



MSc programs will also offer a similar field work modules to a BSc and these are usual shared between UG and PG students with less and more work expected respectively.  An MSc dissertation offers a higher scope for gaining useful fieldwork experience; this is when most students leave the nest and tackle the entire experience without the security demonstrators and classmates would provide should problems arise. 

Working holidays provide another pathway for amassing experience.  I have some experience in these and all I can say is that you should research carefully because some can be more holiday than work.  With the expense of these packages in mind you don’t want to waste your money.  Also, you get out what you put in.  There is value in asking the organisers to be involved in simple tasks such as organising data, logistical operations or simply shadowing staff on the more ‘boring’ and less brochure friendly aspects of the work involved. Getting involved in these areas does not just benefit your CV but also reveals what aspects – if any – of fieldwork you enjoy.

I have certainly done my time in constantly refreshing the webpages of fieldwork post listings, sending my CV off to every poor soul in sight and now find myself on the illustrious pedestal of a PhD Studentship whereby I am posting fieldwork opportunities on those same websites.  I now understand the importance of prior experience placed on these advertisements – you need a guarantee that you have someone who can collect the data soundly, and can withstand the physical and mental stresses of the fieldwork conditions.  

Picture
Picture
In reality, experience doesn’t necessarily have to come from a purely biological background and if you don’t possess this then it is not necessarily an issue in the field.  A degree in biology is not required for ecological recording; these techniques are instead reliant on common sense.  Excelling in class does not necessarily correlate with excelling in fieldwork. Both are components of the study of ecology, but ecology is a multi-disciplinary subject.  I find the necessary qualities to possess are: being personable; being able to maintain morale; and having a good attitude and a sense of humour when things don’t go to plan (which invariably occurs).  Expressing these qualities is definitely worthwhile regardless of how they were attained.

In my experience I have worked alongside individuals with no biological expertise who excelled in the field, but also stellar students whose interests were completely incompatible with the tasks at hand.  So I’ll continue to look outside the box in terms of relevant qualities, but just as it is my duty to ensure that I am picking the right person, it is equally the applicant’s responsibility to understand the reality of the work involved and know whether it is right for them. 


Picture
By Hagen O'Neill


Hagen is a Phd with CEG and studies red deer distribution on the island of Ulva, Scotland.

0 Comments

Using Video Equipment In Research (or Chasing bees)

7/8/2014

0 Comments

 
Hello and welcome to my blog about using video equipment in research.

As my profile on the CEG Durham and the CEG Durham research page suggest, a fair bit of the research carried out the lab group involves observing the behaviours of wild animals in the field. Most of you may immediately think of the use of cameras to snap photos of elusive mammalian predators like tigers and snow leopards or to monitor birds on their nests like we have done here in the School of Biology. However, cameras can also be used to film much smaller taxa and to capture fine details of behaviour. My own research uses cameras to make observations of pollinators foraging behaviours within individual plants. Here is an example of a video from my research. 
When studying ecology (especially animal behaviours), video cameras are great tools to use. They allow one to review and slow down observations, something really useful when you study bees and other pollinators that dart about at high speed. Also, using multiple camera set-ups can effectively allow one individual to collect data that would otherwise require additional observers.   

Despite the great usefulness of camera equipment for anyone wanting to study (or just observe) animal behaviour, I could find very little information on how to go about filming and photographing animals, especially smaller pollinating insects. Most information I found talked about how filming is carried out for TV documentaries and assumed you had access to specialist photography equipment, limitless funds, or a large amount of photography training. Often you may hear claims along the lines of ‘you absolutely need’ this very large and expensive camera. While, I'm sure having such equipment is great, I am going to assume that it is well beyond the budgets of most ecology researches (especially if you want more than one camera).

Picture
British bumblebee, Bombus pascuorum, visiting a hedge nettle, Stachys sylvatica.
In addition to talking about my research and pollinators, I hope this blog can offer some advice and tips to anyone who wants to film and photograph animals for research, especially in the case of pollinators. I will assume that you, like me, don’t have access to hugely expensive equipment (all my equipment could be bought in your neighbourhood electronics stores). I’ll also assume that you, like me, have limited photography training.     
  
Picture
A common American bumblebee, Bombus impatiens.
I want to begin by giving a shout out to Dr Sean Twiss, of Durham University’s seal ecology lab, who provided me with useful advice on use of camera equipment early in my research. 

Now I’ve got this little justification done, I’ll follow soon with a post about getting appropriate camera equipment.    
Picture
By Michael Harrap

Michael is an MRes student who studies pollinator foraging behaviours within vertically arranged inflorescences.


0 Comments
<<Previous

    Archives

    March 2019
    February 2019
    December 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    June 2017
    April 2017
    December 2016
    April 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    November 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    October 2013

    Categories

    All
    Durham's Wildlife
    Fieldwork
    Group Members
    Other
    Publications
    Research
    Stu's Top Moths
    Techniques & Methods
    Undergraduates
    Volunteers

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.