Conservation Ecology Group @ Durham University
  • Home
  • People
  • Research
  • Publications
  • Opportunities
  • News
  • Contact
  • Seminars
  • Ewan Jones

Twitter as a tool for science communication

15/8/2014

2 Comments

 
If you are a scientist and not already on twitter, I urge you to join! You might be reluctant to join (another) social media website, but the benefits of twitter are too good to miss out on... 
What is twitter?
Twitter is an online social media website, which allows users to send and read short messages (of 140 characters) called “tweets”.  
Picture
Six reasons why you should be on twitter:

1.       Communication

Twitter is a great tool for academics to communicate about their research to other academics and to the public, to announce and share publications, and to write and debate about relevant research issues (in an unrestricted manner). Furthermore, scientists are using social media to circulate information about potential opportunities in their lab, upcoming events, or to post updates from meetings and conferences. Along with forging links between scientists, interactions on twitter can improve communication between scientists and the general public.

If you are shy or hesitant, twitter is a great forum to ask a question, voice your opinion, or to start up conversations with leaders (or anyone) in the field, a common problem for early stage researchers! Unlike a conference setting, twitter allows you to sit back and read a conversation between other scientists (without awkwardly standing there), and gives you plenty of time to think about a comment or response (if you feel like giving one).
2.       Networking and exchanging ideas

Twitter is a tool for engaging and communicating with a massive global network of peers and researchers across the world. Twitter allows scientists at any stage of their career path to connect with other scientists, removing the barrier of status. You are able to connect with people who have similar (or very different yet fascinating) interests. Twitter, unlike other social media websites, allows for real time conversations to happen, so you can get direct input and feedback from other academics and the general public. It is a great equaliser and allows for easy communication with people whom you might not ever interact with otherwise.

Are you attending a conference? Twitter can connect you with people who share similar interests to you before you even get there. If you cannot make the conference, following a conference hashtag (e.g. #ESA2014) can keep you informed with what’s happening, who presented, what people thought, what was particularly interesting etc.

3.       Dissemination

Twitter allows you to get your message out there, and the potential platform is immense: compare an audience at a conference with the potential online audience of twitter. For instance, 1731 tweets by 176 people during the 2011 International Congress for Conservation Biology reached 110,000 Twitter users. Not bad! More info here.

Scientists want other people to read about their research right? Studies have shown that tweets linking to peer reviewed PDFs are retweeted 19% of the time, exponentially increasing dissemination. 

Click here for tips on how to use twitter and blogging to disseminate your research.

4.       Inspiration, innovation, exploration

Twitter can be used to keep up to date with the most recent published articles (you can follow journals directly) and is a great resource for scientific inspiration (e.g IFLScience). It is exciting to read other people being enthusiastic about their work, debating with others and communicating with experts in other fields about research that’s happening as we speak. I follow a lot of field biologists and natural historians (e.g. @SeymourDaily) who will often post photos from the field (@Primate and predator) which keeps me excited about nature.

Are you a biologist with a secret passion for astronomy? Twitter allows you to follow whoever you like. You can follow astronomers, NASA, explore hashtags relating to astronomy… giving you access to current and exciting research you might never have learnt about otherwise.

5.       Opportunities

Twitter allows you to enhance your online visibility, it can be very useful to have an online presence these days, especially as an early stage researcher. Who knows, maybe this “getting noticed” could help in the highly competitive job market.

Following a lab group or researcher that you are interested in working with can be a good way to stay up to date on their research, and learn about opportunities in their lab as they come up, all improving your likelihood of getting job. Following that, there are various useful twitter feeds, such as conservation careers (@conservcareers) that post job opportunities on a daily basis.

6.       Helpful resources for grad students

There are loads of specialised groups that are aimed at grad students helping other grad students (#phdchat). For example: tweets by the thesis whisperer team (@thesiswhisperer) offer advice and useful tips on writing and other PhD related stuff. If you are having problems with statistics, there are lots of specialist groups such as R-package related hashtags #rstats, or you could also follow @Rbloggers and statistics for biologists @statsforbios to name a few.



Final tips (click to follow link) :
  • How to use blogging and microblogging to disseminate your research 
  • A scientists guide to social media
  • The use of social media to scientists

Humour:  if twitter had existed at a time of great scientific breakthroughs 
If you are stuck on who to follow:
  • Conservationist? Try these
  • Science geek? Try these
Picture
by Naiara O'Mahony 
@NaiaraOMahony

Naiara is a third year PhD student in CEG, studying the impact of climate change on migrant avian distributions at a global scale.

2 Comments

Stu's Top Moths: Week 11 - Little brown jobs?

13/8/2014

0 Comments

 
Every week we hear from Master's student Stuart Brooker who traps moths weekly in the woodlands around Durham University. Stuart identifies, records and photographs the moths he traps and provides CEG with a weekly update of his trapping efforts. 

Here is Stuart's week 11 report:

The unsettled weather of week 10 continued into this week, and, if anything, night-time temperatures fell away further; leaving the mornings feeling, dare I say it, a little Autumnal. These conditions undoubtedly adversely influence moth survival and activity, and this was reflected in this week’s catch, which was the lowest in terms of both species and individuals since the first week of June. Nevertheless, there were still a number of interesting species well worth showcasing.

The ‘Top Moths’ this week all just happen to be micro-moths. The division between micro- and macro-moths is a rather arbitrary one, reflecting traditional practice rather than taxonomic-correctness; although – with the inevitable exceptions – many micro-moth families are considered to be more primitive than those of the macro-moths. Micro-moths could be considered as the ultimate LBJ’s, and are often overlooked or ignored. However, in both form and ecology, the 1600 or so UK species are fascinating and diverse. What’s more, when viewed up close, many are revealed to be every bit as attractive and intricate in pattern as their bigger relatives.
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
The Bee Moth (Aphomia sociella) may look the picture of innocence, but this species is a parasite of wild social bees – especially bumblebees (Bombus spp.) – and wasps. The species is also notable for having an unusual breeding behaviour, whereby males initiate courtship by emitting both acoustic and pheremonal signals to attract mates. Following mating, the female enters a bee nest to lay up to 100 eggs. Once hatched, the caterpillars may end up destroying the nest by consuming the brood comb and the bee larvae within (Kalinová et al. 2009; Kindl et al. 2012).
















Apotomis betuletana is one of a number of small moths that have evolved a cryptic colouration that lends them the appearance of a bird-dropping. This less than glamorous masquerade is particularly common within the family Tortricidae (but not confined to it), and there even exists a guide book dedicated to them. For those familiar with the scientific names of trees, it would be no surprise that the larvae of this particular species feed on the leaves of birches (Betula spp.).


Shining golden-brassy, the typical colour form of Argyresthia goedartella is unmistakeable. This exquisite little moth is common and widespread throughout Britain – with the exception of the far northern Isles. Like Apotomis betuletana,  its larvae feast on birches, but instead they burrow into the buds or catkins and feed from within.






Ypsolopha parenthesella exhibits a number of variations in both pattern and colour and some of the plainer forms could possibly be confused with other species, but the typical form with the large white marking – as shown in the photograph – is distinctive. The species is adapted to feed on a variety of tree species, a trait that no doubt contributes to its common and widespread status.
So, it turns out that micro-moths can be serenading bee-nest wreckers, bird-poo imitators, or decked-out head-to-toe in Christmas wrap ... boring Little Brown Jobs they most certainly ain’t!

Stay tuned weekly for more 'Stu's Top Moths' or follow us on twitter for updates and photos of moths and other wildlife around Durham University!
0 Comments

Red Deer Project awarded a British Deer Society Grant

8/8/2014

0 Comments

 
The British Deer Society has awarded a research grant to a collaborative red deer project between researchers from CEG and the James Hutton Institute. The funding was granted to Dr Justin Irvine from the James Hutton Institute in collaboration with Danielle Gauthier and Dr Philip Stephens here at CEG, to conduct a pilot study to detect trends in the spatial and temporal distribution of red deer in Scotland. As a charity, the BDS undertakes and funds research projects on cervid conservation and management. 
Picture
0 Comments

Stu's Top Moths: Week 10 - Have you heard the one about the old Lady and the Copper?

8/8/2014

0 Comments

 
Masters student Stuart Brooker has been trapping moths for 10 weeks in the woodlands around Durham University. Stuart identifies, records and photographs the moths he traps and provides us with a weekly update of his trapping efforts. 

Here is Stuart's week 10 report: 
"The weather became unsettled this week, and night-time temperatures fell off slightly from those of prior weeks. Nevertheless, on the evening of 30th July, forecasts informed that there would be no overnight rainfall or through the following morning – so, confidently, I left my trap quietly doing its business in its usual spot in the woodlands. However, when I looked out of the window in the early morning, I witnessed the aftermath of a great deluge! As I walked to the trap-site, the small woodland stream, usually little more than a gentle trickle, was now a raging torrent. My fears where confirmed when I reached the trap and saw that the mercury vapour bulb had shattered (but still burning bright). Inside the trap, a set of soggy cardboard egg cartons provided limited shelter for over 300 weather-beaten moths. Two-thirds of the catch was either a Bird-cherry Ermine (Yponomeuta evonymella) or a Large Yellow Underwing (Noctua pronuba) – two very common and widespread species that evidently occur in good numbers and find light irresistible.

In amongst the Ermines and Yellow Underwings was a single Old Lady (Mormo maura). This large moth is unmistakable, even when most of its markings have been worn, or washed, away! It is widespread in Britain but described as ‘local’ rather than common. However, although it may be drawn by light, it enters the trap infrequently, and as such, may be under-recorded by trappers. Svensson’s Copper Underwing is a moth of similar hue to the Old Lady. In contrast however, it looked very ‘fresh’ and its colouration was deep and rich. The species is very similar to the closely-related Copper Underwing (Amphipyra pyramidea), but a combination of subtle features suggested this individual was very likely to be A. berbera. Other infrequent visitors to the trap this week included a new addition to the list of ‘thorns’ (see weeks 5 and 9 for others) – the Dusky Thorn, a Small Phoenix and Oak Nycteoline – a diminutive macromoth that, when I placed it on an oak tree to photograph it, it wrapped its wings around the shoot to hide its outline and promptly ‘disappeared’."

Picture
Old Lady (Mormo maura)
Picture
Svensson's Copper Underwing (Amphipyra berbera)
Picture
Dusky Thorn (Ennomos fuscantaria)
Picture
Small Phoenix (Ecliptopera silaceata)
Picture
Oak Nycteoline (Nycteola revayana)

Stay tuned weekly for more 'Stu's Top Moths' or follow us on twitter for updates and photos of moths and other wildlife around Durham University!
0 Comments
<<Previous
Forward>>

    Archives

    March 2019
    February 2019
    December 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    June 2017
    April 2017
    December 2016
    April 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    November 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    October 2013

    Categories

    All
    Durham's Wildlife
    Fieldwork
    Group Members
    Other
    Publications
    Research
    Stu's Top Moths
    Techniques & Methods
    Undergraduates
    Volunteers

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.